Skip to content

Conversation

@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator

@marc-hb marc-hb commented Nov 30, 2020

No description provided.

@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

marc-hb commented Dec 1, 2020

Expected failures in https://sof-ci.01.org/softestpr/PR537/build441/devicetest/ but not all across the board.

Break the strange dependency between how many processes to start and how
many were found in the previous run.

Also move it next to func_run_pipeline_with_type() to make it clearer
it's actually a parameter of that function.

Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
pidof ignores processes in uninterruptable sleep by default, probably
because sending them signals is futile. pidof has a -z option but it's
just simpler to use "ps".

Also de-duplicate code into new ps_checks() function

Fixes: thesofproject#472

Any aplay or arecord process can be in uninterruptable sleep when doing
I/O but the easiest way to reproduce is to wait a few seconds and let the
DSP go to sleep.

Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

marc-hb commented Dec 1, 2020

https://sof-ci.01.org/softestpr/PR537/build442/devicetest/ with test hack 92a555d + candidate fix d56e0b9 is all PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant