Skip to content

Conversation

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator

The rate_min/rate_max is obsolete, should use rates with list of rates to support. Without this change the playback of non-48 kHz content happens with 48 kHz rate with pitch shift effect. Aplay shows only a warning.

The rate_min/rate_max is obsolete, should use rates with
list of rates to support. Without this change the playback
of non-48 kHz content happens with 48 kHz rate with pitch
shift effect. Aplay shows only a warning.

Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <seppo.ingalsuo@linux.intel.com>
@singalsu singalsu mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2024
@singalsu singalsu marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2024 10:11
@singalsu singalsu requested review from jsarha and ranj063 as code owners June 11, 2024 10:11
@singalsu singalsu requested review from lgirdwood, lyakh and ujfalusi June 11, 2024 10:12
@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ujfalusi Thanks for help, this change fixed the issue!

Copy link
Contributor

@gbernatxintel gbernatxintel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my opinion, the change is correct, but isn't there an error in the line above?
The format should not be saved
formats “S32_LE,S24_LE,S16_LE”

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In my opinion, the change is correct, but isn't there an error in the line above? The format should not be saved formats “S32_LE,S24_LE,S16_LE”

I didn't know. Is there a difference in using " " or ' ' or something else?

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

In my opinion, the change is correct, but isn't there an error in the line above? The format should not be saved formats “S32_LE,S24_LE,S16_LE”

I didn't know. Is there a difference in using " " or ' ' or something else?

IIUC the topology compiler will stringify if its missing ""

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

@singalsu I assume we need for v2.10 ?

@singalsu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@singalsu I assume we need for v2.10 ?

None of these development topologies ends up to binary FW release, so I don't think it's needed. If there's source tarball for release, then it would make sense. How is it?

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

@singalsu I assume we need for v2.10 ?

None of these development topologies ends up to binary FW release, so I don't think it's needed. If there's source tarball for release, then it would make sense. How is it?

ok, not needed.

@kv2019i kv2019i merged commit 1470e6c into thesofproject:main Jun 13, 2024
@singalsu singalsu deleted the tplg2_fix_benchmark_srcpcm_rates branch August 21, 2024 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants