Skip to content

Conversation

@yongzhi1
Copy link
Contributor

@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 commented Jun 21, 2023

Tested multi-stream capture on core1.

@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 requested review from jsarha and ranj063 as code owners June 21, 2023 21:05
@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 marked this pull request as draft June 21, 2023 21:05
@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 force-pushed the connected-pipe branch 2 times, most recently from 4f6fd74 to 1e3f2f8 Compare June 22, 2023 23:39
Enable more complex pipelines for multi-core use cases.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>
@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 requested a review from RanderWang July 7, 2023 20:56
@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 changed the title [TEST]: topology2: nocodec-multicore: Add connected pipelines topology2: nocodec-multicore: Add connected pipelines Jul 7, 2023
@yongzhi1 yongzhi1 marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2023 20:57
@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

@ranj063 @jsarha any comments ?

@jsarha
Copy link
Contributor

jsarha commented Jul 10, 2023

Already approved, but I have minor nitpick. Maybe the PASSTRHOUGH variable could have more descriptive name, like DMIC_SFX_ENABLE. I would also encourage to always write some comments about what these new PCMs and pipelines are for, when adding them.

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

Already approved, but I have minor nitpick. Maybe the PASSTRHOUGH variable could have more descriptive name, like DMIC_SFX_ENABLE. I would also encourage to always write some comments about what these new PCMs and pipelines are for, when adding them.

@yongzhi1 can you make this an incremantal update. Thanks.

@yongzhi1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yongzhi1 can you make this an incremantal update. Thanks.

Ack, the code was moved from the cavs-nocodec.conf based on #6783, maybe we can use the regular nocodec version for multi-core support, eventually.

@lgirdwood
Copy link
Member

SOFCI TEST

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants