-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
[SKIP CI] sparse: temporarily ignore MTL address errors and add to daily tests #6722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
e2622b7 to
7b96338
Compare
|
MTL warnings are still visible in https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/3625503925/jobs/6113619508 but they don't "break the build" any more. EDIT: same again in https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/3688703910/jobs/6243807588 https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/actions/runs/3625503919/jobs/6113620156 has the stupid "we don't talk about sparse" checkpatch warning and nothing else. |
scripts/parse_sparse_output.sh
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this means, we will see complete MTL sparse output including "address space" warnings in CI, it just won't be a failure? Could you maybe remove "SKIP CI" to let us see what it will look like?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this means, we will see complete MTL sparse output including "address space" warnings in CI, it just won't be a failure?
Yes, see link in comment above and in the "Checks" box below.
Could you maybe remove "SKIP CI"
Only sof-ci/jenkins reads "SKIP CI", Github does not care. Again look at the "Details" box below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, thanks! I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to green-wash our failures, but as long as we have the output, I personally can live with it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like it either but it's been red for too long now. I also made sure it's very easy to revert.
Can you approve then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MTL errors will be fixed after v2.4 is tagged - lets fix instead of hiding. The other patches are fine in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lgirdwood re-submitting the other patches is not an issue but does anyone have any idea how to fix the current warnings on MTL and a line of sight on a fix? Right now we are actively training users to ignore the results on MTL and we are blind to possibly WORSE MTL regressions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will be fixed after v2.4 is tagged, IOW early next week.
scripts/parse_sparse_output.sh
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MTL errors will be fixed after v2.4 is tagged - lets fix instead of hiding. The other patches are fine in this PR.
|
I resubmitted the cleanup commits that don't change anything in this new PR:
I am sure it's a bad idea to "red-wash" our sparse warnings on MTL, which is what we have been doing for a few weeks now. In other words: if the sparse analysis degrades from "we have warnings" to "it does not even build" then no one will notice. "Red-washed". This of course on top of training people to ignore MTL warnings in the first place. |
We cannot keep CI checks failing for that long. Should be reverted as soon as the code is fixed. Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
Because why not. Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
7b96338 to
44813d1
Compare
|
@lyakh how are the SPARSE MTL fixes in Zephyr coming ? |
|
I believe all sparse warnings are fixed in the Zephyr main branch but upgrading Zephyr is blocked by zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#53327 (comment) |
|
Actually let's keep this for adding to daily tests |
|
address space warnings are all fixed now. Adding sparse to daily tests in new |
There was an address space regression and no one noticed: |
6 commits, see messages