alloc: xtos: remove xtos memory zones. #10088

lgirdwood · 2025-07-02T16:53:13Z

Use a Linux kernel like heap API now that zephyr allocator deals with
the complexity.

This change removes the memory zone and memory capabilities fields from
allocation APIs and rolls these into SOF_MEM_FLAG_ bitmask. This bitmask
can be ORed to make any combination of memory needed.

Additionally this change introduces the new SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL and
SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER flags that have no action today but are used as the
base default allocation bits for all allocations.

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the old mem_zone parameter from rmalloc/rzalloc calls and replaces it with flag-based allocation (e.g., SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT). It updates the allocator APIs in alloc.c and alloc.h, adjusts all call sites across the codebase, and updates the dma_sg_alloc signature.

Drop enum mem_zone from rmalloc/rzalloc, switching to flags-only parameters
Replace shared‐zone allocations with SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT where needed
Update dma_sg_alloc prototype to remove zone parameter

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 150 out of 150 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
zephyr/lib/alloc.c & alloc.h	Remove `zone` from allocator signatures and switch to flags
zephyr/lib/regions_mm.c & fast-get.c	Update calls to `rzalloc`/`rmalloc` to drop zone argument
zephyr/include/sof/lib/dma.h	Remove `zone` parameter from `dma_sg_alloc` prototype
…many other files…	Update all call sites to the new allocator API

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

zephyr/include/sof/lib/dma.h:288

The function signature was updated to remove the zone parameter. Please update the function comment to remove references to the old zone argument and document the new allocation behavior based solely on downstream flags.

		 uintptr_t dma_buffer_addr, uintptr_t external_addr);

zephyr/lib/regions_mm.c:129

Dropping the shared-zone parameter and switching to SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT may change cache behavior. Verify that allocations which previously used SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED still land in uncached/coherent memory as intended, and add any missing flags (e.g. an explicit uncached flag) to preserve prior semantics.

		struct sys_mem_blocks *new_allocator = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(sys_mem_blocks_t));

Copilot · 2025-07-02T16:54:48Z

zephyr/lib/alloc.c

 		heap = &l3_heap;
 		/* Uncached L3_HEAP should be not used */
-		if (!zone_is_cached(zone)) {
+		if (!(flags & SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT)) {


[nitpick] The comment and variable names still refer to zone-based caching. Update comments above this logic to explain that cache behavior is now driven by flags rather than legacy zone enums, improving clarity for future maintainers.

kv2019i

Getting rid of zones looks good and will simpify application code. I did note multiple SHARED zone calls replaced with a alloc without the coherent flag. I stopped after first two dozen cases. If this is intentional, might be better to have the allocation type change in a separate PR to make reviewing easier.

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:00:01Z

zephyr/lib/regions_mm.c


 	struct vmh_heap *new_heap =
-		rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*new_heap));
+		rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*new_heap));


Why drop SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT ?

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:00:21Z

zephyr/lib/regions_mm.c

 		 */
 		uint32_t *allocator_bitarray_bitfield =
-			rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, bitfield_size);
+			rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, bitfield_size);


COHERENT dropped here.

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:00:35Z

zephyr/lib/regions_mm.c

 		allocators_bitarray->bundles = allocator_bitarray_bitfield;

-		uint32_t *sizes_bitarray_bitfield = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0,
+		uint32_t *sizes_bitarray_bitfield = rzalloc(0,


kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:00:59Z

src/audio/copier/copier_dai.c

 	}

-	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));
+	dd = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));


COHERENT dropped

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:01:39Z

src/audio/dai-zephyr.c

 	dev->ipc_config = *config;

-	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));
+	dd = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));


COHERENT dropped

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:03:45Z

src/debug/tester/tester_dummy_test.c

 static int dummy_test_case_init(struct processing_module *mod, void **ctx)
 {
 	struct tester_module_dummy_test_data *data =
-		rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_SYS_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*data));


COHERENT (although not sure if this is really needed)

kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:04:03Z

src/drivers/amd/common/acp_dmic_dai.c

 	dai_info(dai, "dmic dai probe");
 	/* allocate private data */
-	acp = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));
+	acp = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));


kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:04:14Z

src/drivers/amd/rembrandt/acp_hs_dai.c

 	dai_info(dai, "HS dai probe");
 	/* allocate private data */
-	acp = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));
+	acp = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));


kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:04:24Z

src/drivers/amd/rembrandt/acp_sw_audio_dai.c

 	dai_info(dai, "#$AMD$# SW dai probe");
 	/* allocate private data */
-	acp = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));
+	acp = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));


kv2019i · 2025-07-03T14:04:33Z

src/drivers/amd/renoir/acp_sp_dai.c

 	dai_info(dai, "SP dai probe");
 	/* allocate private data */
-	acp = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));
+	acp = rzalloc(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*acp));


lyakh · 2025-07-07T08:52:02Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c

 	}

-	stream_addr = rballoc_align(0, caps, size, align);
+	stream_addr = rballoc_align(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, size, align);


buffer_alloc() is sometimes called with caps == SOF_MEM_CAPS_DMA which now should be translated to SOF_MEM_FLAG_DMA. In buffer_alloc_struct() buffer->caps should be converted to buffer->flags or bool buffer->dma too

comp_buffer now has caps replaced with flags in latest. Calling convention updated too.

lyakh · 2025-07-07T08:59:22Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c


 	for (size = preferred_size; size >= minimum_size; size -= minimum_size) {
-		stream_addr = rballoc_align(0, caps, size, align);
+		stream_addr = rballoc_align(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER,  size, align);


ditto - need to handle caps

lyakh · 2025-07-07T08:59:55Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c

 	if (!alignment)
 		new_ptr = rbrealloc(audio_stream_get_addr(&buffer->stream), SOF_MEM_FLAG_NO_COPY,
-				    buffer->caps, size, audio_stream_get_size(&buffer->stream));
+				    size, audio_stream_get_size(&buffer->stream));


need buffer->flags or buffer->dma

lyakh · 2025-07-07T09:45:46Z

src/audio/dai-legacy.c

 		}
 	} else {
-		dd->dma_buffer = buffer_alloc(buffer_size, SOF_MEM_CAPS_DMA, 0,
+		dd->dma_buffer = buffer_alloc(buffer_size, 0, SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER | SOF_MEM_FLAG_DMA,


ok, if all calls to buffer_alloc(..., SOF_MEM_CAPS_DMAm,...) are modified like this, then this fixes one part of the problem, but we still need to fix buffer->caps

lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:12:49Z

src/drivers/dw/dma.c


-		dw_chan->lli = rmalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME, SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT,
-				       SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM | SOF_MEM_CAPS_DMA,
+		dw_chan->lli = rmalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL | SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT,


lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:46:42Z

src/lib/ams.c

 	int ret = 0;

-	*ams = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_SYS, SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM,
+	*ams = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER | SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT,


not sure if AMS fits USER

lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:48:12Z

src/lib/dma.c


 	/* allocate dma channels */
-	dma->chan = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM,
+	dma->chan = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER | SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT,


dma_init() - USER?

This is the SOF wrapper, so presumed to be user today. Zephyr driver will be KERNEL.

lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:54:15Z

src/schedule/edf_schedule.c

 		return -EEXIST;

-	edf_pdata = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_SYS_RUNTIME, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM,
+	edf_pdata = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL | SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT,


why COHERENT? also several times below

search and replace issue. fixed.

lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:57:21Z

src/trace/dma-trace.c


 	/* For DMA to work properly the buffer must be correctly aligned */
-	buf = rballoc_align(0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM | SOF_MEM_CAPS_DMA,
+	buf = rballoc_align(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER | SOF_MEM_FLAG_DMA,


lyakh · 2025-07-07T10:59:26Z

tools/plugin/modules/alsa.c


 	/* allocate  memory for file comp data */
-	cd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*cd));
+	cd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, sizeof(*cd));


maybe use 0 for tests, plugins and similar?

consistency. long term this will just be malloc().

lgirdwood · 2025-07-07T13:06:38Z

Review comments fixed for coherent, dma. ZONE_SYS checking will be done in a subsequent PR since this issue is prior to this PR.

lyakh · 2025-07-07T13:58:13Z

Review comments fixed for coherent, dma. ZONE_SYS checking will be done in a subsequent PR since this issue is prior to this PR.

@lgirdwood arguably it wasn't an issue before - it was "panic by design." But if we merge this now we lose all those ZONE_SYS locations and won't know what to fix?

lgirdwood · 2025-07-07T14:28:09Z

Review comments fixed for coherent, dma. ZONE_SYS checking will be done in a subsequent PR since this issue is prior to this PR.

@lgirdwood arguably it wasn't an issue before - it was "panic by design." But if we merge this now we lose all those ZONE_SYS locations and won't know what to fix?

No - I have an AI generated scripts thats picking these up. I may be able to append to this PR today after all.

lyakh

thanks for adding the second commit! Now if we only could swap them... As they stand to check that none of those SOF_MEM_ZONE_SYS* allocations got skipped. E.g. I currently count 43 allocations in the code. The second commit in this PR handles 20 of them... Also - another effect of those allocations is that they're never freed. I think it would be good to indicate that somehow in the code - either with a NEVER_FREED flag or with a comment?

lyakh · 2025-07-08T06:20:10Z

src/schedule/edf_schedule.c

+	if (!edf_sch) {
+		tr_err(&edf_tr, "scheduler_init_edf(): allocation failed");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}


there's an error case 13 lines below - should add an rfree() there

lyakh · 2025-07-08T06:21:23Z

src/drivers/mediatek/mt8196/ipc.c

+	if (!iipc) {
+		tr_err(&ipc_tr, "Unable to allocate memory for IPC data");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}


this function panics on all other failures, should it panic here too?

I've made it panic for platforms with no MMU atm, but long term this will become userspace so safe to return an error later on as userspace is added.

lyakh · 2025-07-08T06:22:11Z

src/drivers/mediatek/mt8195/ipc.c

 	iipc = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL, sizeof(*iipc));
+	if (!iipc) {
+		tr_err(&ipc_tr, "Unable to allocate memory for IPC data");
+		return -ENOMEM;


somehow I regularly end up reviewing from bottom to top. Same comment as below - panic?

lyakh · 2025-07-08T06:22:30Z

src/drivers/mediatek/mt818x/ipc.c

+	if (!iipc) {
+		tr_err(&ipc_tr, "Unable to allocate memory for IPC data");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}


same comment as below

lyakh · 2025-07-08T06:23:05Z

src/audio/base_fw_intel.c

 	tuple_data = rballoc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, size);
+	if (!tuple_data) {
+		LOG_ERR("basefw_mem_state_info(): allocation failed");
+		return IPC4_ERROR_INVALID_PARAM;


I think there's an IPC4 error for "out of memory"

I initially thought that too, but no.

@lgirdwood IPC4_OUT_OF_MEMORY

@lgirdwood should we update this one while fixing rfree()?

I'll followup in another PR - I want to change it to IPC4_ERROR_ prefix, this was why it was not grep-able

lyakh

almost good

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:07:09Z

src/lib/dai.c

 				     sizeof(*group_list));
+		if (!group_list) {
+			tr_err(&dai_tr, "dai_group_list_get(): failed to allocate group_list for core %d",
+			       core_id);


we should ask AI to make a tree-wide PR to remove function names from all prints ;-)

yeah, although we don't yet have the function and line number on the CI logs yet today.

yeah, although we don't yet have the function and line number on the CI logs yet today.

@lgirdwood we do have function names https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR10088/build13773/devicetest/index.html?model=PTLH_RVP_NOCODEC&testcase=check-playback-3times

[ 408.856116] <inf> ll_schedule: zephyr_ll_task_schedule_common: task add 0xa0101840 0xa0092524U priority 0 flags 0x0 [ 408.856701] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_get_properties: SSP16: fifo 168420, handshake 2, init delay 0 [ 408.856708] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_early_start: SSP16 RX [ 408.856726] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_start: SSP16 RX

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:21:58Z

src/schedule/edf_schedule.c

 int scheduler_init_edf(void)
 {
 	struct edf_schedule_data *edf_sch;
+	int ret = 0;


initialisation unneeded

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:23:40Z

src/schedule/edf_schedule.c

-	if (edf_sch->irq < 0)
+	ret = interrupt_get_irq(PLATFORM_SCHEDULE_IRQ,
+				PLATFORM_SCHEDULE_IRQ_NAME);
+	if (edf_sch->irq < 0) {


something's wrong here. You probably don't need ret, just keep the original assignment

fixed the ret check, but we cant use edf_sch->irq for return value since we have to now free edf_sch.

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:26:57Z

src/schedule/schedule.c

 			       sizeof(**sch));
+		if (!*sch) {
+			tr_err(&sch_tr, "scheduler_register(): allocation failed");
+			return;


I suppose if we cannot even allocate a list of schedulers, that's a rather certain reason to panic, but not too important, it will die later anyway

actually better to panic here today. updated.

sof_panic()?

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:40:55Z

src/schedule/task.c

 	*main_task = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL,
 			     sizeof(**main_task));
+	if (!*main_task)
+		panic(SOF_IPC_PANIC_MEM);


oh, interesting. I don't see panic() defined anywhere! You probably meant sof_panic(). We have one more use of panic() in

sof/posix/include/rtos/spinlock.h

Line 94 in 8e40795

panic(SOF_IPC_PANIC_DEADLOCK); /* lock not acquired */ \

- probably macro never used

@lgirdwood this file isn't used any more. You can leave it as is, I'll remove it

lyakh · 2025-07-08T12:42:47Z

src/trace/trace.c

 	sof->trace = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER | SOF_MEM_FLAG_COHERENT, sizeof(*sof->trace));
+	if (!sof->trace) {
+		mtrace_printf(LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, "trace_init(): allocation failed");
+		sof_panic(SOF_IPC_PANIC_IPC);


do we need to panic here?

This is quite a bad situation, as there be no fast way to know where a failure would be later on (as there may be no trace data) so best to give up early.

Use a Linux kernel like heap API now that zephyr allocator deals with the complexity. This change removes the memory zone and memory capabilities fields from allocation APIs and rolls these into SOF_MEM_FLAG_ bitmask. This bitmask can be ORed to make any combination of memory needed. Additionally this change introduces the new SOF_MEM_FLAG_KERNEL and SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER flags that have no action today but are used as the base default allocation bits for all allocations. Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>

Previously with xtos config the linker would reserve a guaranteed heap for init system allocations that were all guaranteed to succeed. These allocations never failed with Zephyr as they were all done at early boot. Be more mindful and check in the unlikely result of a failure. e.g. a Kconfig with heapsize == 0 Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>

lgirdwood · 2025-07-09T11:39:13Z

@wszypelt not expecting this to fail, since past 3 runs passed and last update was for error handling at init. Can you rerun ? Thanks !

lyakh · 2025-07-10T07:39:23Z

src/lib/dai.c

 				     sizeof(*group_list));
+		if (!group_list) {
+			tr_err(&dai_tr, "dai_group_list_get(): failed to allocate group_list for core %d",
+			       core_id);


yeah, although we don't yet have the function and line number on the CI logs yet today.

@lgirdwood we do have function names https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR10088/build13773/devicetest/index.html?model=PTLH_RVP_NOCODEC&testcase=check-playback-3times

[ 408.856116] <inf> ll_schedule: zephyr_ll_task_schedule_common: task add 0xa0101840 0xa0092524U priority 0 flags 0x0 [ 408.856701] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_get_properties: SSP16: fifo 168420, handshake 2, init delay 0 [ 408.856708] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_early_start: SSP16 RX [ 408.856726] <inf> dai_intel_ssp: dai_ssp_start: SSP16 RX

lyakh · 2025-07-10T07:45:10Z

src/schedule/edf_schedule.c

+	ret = interrupt_get_irq(PLATFORM_SCHEDULE_IRQ,
+				PLATFORM_SCHEDULE_IRQ_NAME);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		free(edf_sch);


rfree() but this file isn't used any more, I'm removing it in #10106 so it doesn't even break compilation

lyakh · 2025-07-10T07:46:00Z

src/schedule/schedule.c

 			       sizeof(**sch));
+		if (!*sch) {
+			tr_err(&sch_tr, "scheduler_register(): allocation failed");
+			return;


sof_panic()?

lyakh · 2025-07-10T07:48:04Z

src/audio/base_fw_intel.c

 	tuple_data = rballoc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, size);
+	if (!tuple_data) {
+		LOG_ERR("basefw_mem_state_info(): allocation failed");
+		return IPC4_ERROR_INVALID_PARAM;


@lgirdwood should we update this one while fixing rfree()?

only typos left

bardliao · 2025-07-10T11:21:30Z

src/drivers/imx/ipc.c

-		bzero(iipc->dh_buffer.page_table, PLATFORM_PAGE_TABLE_SIZE);
+	if (!iipc->dh_buffer.page_table)
+		sof_panic(SOF_IPC_PANIC_IPC);
+	bzero(iipc->dh_buffer.page_table, PLATFORM_PAGE_TABLE_SIZE);


bzero(iipc->dh_buffer.page_table, PLATFORM_PAGE_TABLE_SIZE); was only called under if (iipc->dh_buffer.page_table). Now it is always called. Is it Intentional?

@bardliao yes, because now there's a panic otherwise

yes - we panic if page table allocation fails and zero it if allocation succeeds.

softwarecki

A bit of a late review, but perhaps the comments will be useful in the future. New error messages have been added in a few places. They contain unnecessary function name.

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T15:29:17Z

src/audio/google/google_rtc_audio_processing_mock.c

 	rfree(state->aec_reference);
-	state->aec_reference = rballoc(0,
-				       SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM,
+	state->aec_reference = rballoc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER,


Missing check for null

This was actually checked in the caller, but I've a PR that improves the flow to make this more readable.

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T15:29:54Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c

 	if (!new_ptr && size > audio_stream_get_size(&buffer->stream)) {
-		buf_err(buffer, "resize can't alloc %u bytes type %u",
-			audio_stream_get_size(&buffer->stream), buffer->caps);
+		buf_err(buffer, "resize can't alloc %u bytes type 0x%x",


'bytes of flags'

Fixed all of these in a new PR.

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T15:30:10Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c

 	/* we couldn't allocate bigger chunk */
 	if (!new_ptr && new_size > actual_size) {
-		buf_err(buffer, "resize can't alloc %zu bytes type %u", new_size, buffer->caps);
+		buf_err(buffer, "resize can't alloc %zu bytes type 0x%x", new_size, buffer->flags);


'bytes of flags'

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T15:30:57Z

src/audio/buffers/comp_buffer.c

 	if (!stream_addr) {
-		tr_err(&buffer_tr, "buffer_alloc_range(): could not alloc size = %zu bytes of type = %u",
-		       minimum_size, caps);
+		tr_err(&buffer_tr, "buffer_alloc_range(): could not alloc size = %zu bytes of type = 0x%x",


'bytes of flags'

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:12:25Z

tools/plugin/modules/shm.c


 	/* allocate  memory for shm comp data */
-	cd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*cd));
+	cd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, sizeof(*cd));


missing coherent flag?

No, you are right to call out though - its just the host based code does not need this flag. i.e. it was wrong in the first place here and in all places below.

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:13:00Z

tools/testbench/file.c

 	struct copier_data *ccd = module_get_private_data(mod);

-	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));
+	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, sizeof(*dd));


missing coherent flag?

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:13:06Z

tools/testbench/file.c

 	struct comp_dev *dev = mod->dev;

-	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*dd));
+	dd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_FLAG_USER, sizeof(*dd));


missing coherent flag?

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:13:12Z

tools/testbench/file.c


 	tb_debug_print("file_init()\n");

-	ccd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*ccd));


missing coherent flag?

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:13:18Z

tools/testbench/file.c

 	mod_data->private = ccd;

 	/* File component data is placed to copier's ipcgtw_data */
-	cd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*cd));


missing coherent flag?

softwarecki · 2025-07-11T16:15:01Z

zephyr/lib/alloc.c

 	void *new_ptr;

 	if (!ptr) {
 		/* TODO: Use correct zone */


comment to remove

fixed that and a few other ZONE comments in #10114

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 2, 2025 16:53

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch from 62b5109 to d18ea27 Compare July 2, 2025 16:58

lgirdwood added the DNM Do Not Merge tag label Jul 2, 2025

kv2019i reviewed Jul 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch from d18ea27 to b2bc199 Compare July 5, 2025 18:41

lgirdwood requested a review from tmleman as a code owner July 5, 2025 18:41

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch 3 times, most recently from 5596dae to 75aee7f Compare July 6, 2025 16:50

lyakh reviewed Jul 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch from 75aee7f to e86eb4d Compare July 7, 2025 12:28

lgirdwood removed the DNM Do Not Merge tag label Jul 7, 2025

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch 2 times, most recently from 0a00688 to 3a3d6c0 Compare July 7, 2025 13:05

lyakh reviewed Jul 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

lyakh mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2025

userspace: Preparation for userspace loadable modules support #10103

Merged

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch from 1be651c to 8e40795 Compare July 8, 2025 11:28

lyakh reviewed Jul 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

lrgirdwo added 2 commits July 9, 2025 10:07

lgirdwood force-pushed the xtos-heap1 branch from 8e40795 to 78f5376 Compare July 9, 2025 09:14

lyakh reviewed Jul 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

lyakh approved these changes Jul 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

bardliao reviewed Jul 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

ranj063 approved these changes Jul 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

lgirdwood merged commit b35aba3 into thesofproject:main Jul 10, 2025
36 of 44 checks passed

lgirdwood deleted the xtos-heap1 branch July 10, 2025 20:04

softwarecki reviewed Jul 11, 2025

View reviewed changes


		tb_debug_print("file_init()\n");

		ccd = rzalloc(SOF_MEM_ZONE_RUNTIME_SHARED, 0, SOF_MEM_CAPS_RAM, sizeof(*ccd));

alloc: xtos: remove xtos memory zones. #10088

alloc: xtos: remove xtos memory zones. #10088

Uh oh!

Conversation

lgirdwood commented Jul 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Reviewed Changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jul 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kv2019i left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lgirdwood commented Jul 7, 2025

Uh oh!

lyakh commented Jul 7, 2025

Uh oh!

lgirdwood commented Jul 7, 2025

Uh oh!

lyakh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lgirdwood commented Jul 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading