Skip to content

Conversation

@tfboyd
Copy link
Member

@tfboyd tfboyd commented May 16, 2017

No description provided.

@tensorflow-jenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

performance_models.md
benchmarks.md
quantization.md
>>>
Copy link
Member

@rmlarsen rmlarsen May 16, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is ">>>" intentional?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it puts a space. It will look just like the link below. XLA ends up broken out a little. I would rather have bold sections or something but this is better, in my opinion, than having it all smashed together. XLA is a section not really individual pages and this is a step back in the direction. The step actually already took place weeks ago. But if you do not merge the website changes back into the last release there is a possibility that they will get erased if the site is regenerated. Wolff wants to regen the site so i needed to push these changes back into the release branch. I gambled it would not need to be done and last. The best approach is write something and wait a couple months for the site to get updated or possibly just edit in github vs. google. My aggravation is being told how easy this process is but it does not seem easy to me, which is ok and I do not mind I just do not like the ruse.

https://www.tensorflow.org/performance/

@rmlarsen rmlarsen self-assigned this May 16, 2017
@rmlarsen
Copy link
Member

@tensorflow-jenkins test this please

@av8ramit av8ramit merged commit f1995dd into tensorflow:r1.1 May 16, 2017
allenlavoie pushed a commit to allenlavoie/tensorflow that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants