Hello, maybe it is stupid to ask here, but you did not publish your mail.

also, the original host-centered ActiveScripting SDK or ScriuptControls SDK did not survive on the internet. It was all paper-only back in 2000s...

So, there is a iScriptControl.AddObject interface, but it does NOT return any token to control the bridge after it was created

I know using your code instead of the SDK (code by contract) is stupid (code for implementation), actually twice stupid (code for someone else's implementation), but that was the best i could find

I was thinking about calling AddObject(<name to remove>, NULL but your code would throw AV there, clearly that was not an expected way...

CTScriptObject::CTScriptObject(IDispatch *pObject, VARIANT_BOOL bAddMembers)
{
	m_cRef = 1;
	m_pObject = pObject;
	m_pObject->AddRef();
	m_bAddMembers = bAddMembers;
}

I may create and register a dummy no-properties iDispatch stub, but that feels even more stupid than registering NULL

Also, that would not de-pollute the global namespace.
Also, i don;t know and feel insecure if that will clear away the secondary objects that very (bAddMembers)

Now why should global objects ever be de-registered? Huh... our legacy app was designed in a clever way to use global objects in stead of functio narguments to handle events...

Dunno, i feel like going to hunt for leaked Win2000 sources now, i really don't know where to look for information now... Well, sorry for whining.

I just hope you had hoarded a lto of AS/WSC/WSH documents and can give some authoritative clue...