Skip to content

Conversation

@peterrehm
Copy link
Contributor

There is wrong information about the inheritance of validation groups.

I have tested it extensively and some findings are documented here: symfony/symfony#20857

I also asked Bernhard about what the intended behavior is, but I assume
as I have documented it now was the original expected behaviour.

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Dec 13, 2016

@peterrehm Shouldn't this be merged into the 2.7 branch?

@peterrehm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, my bad.

@peterrehm peterrehm changed the base branch from 2.8 to 2.7 December 14, 2016 08:52
@peterrehm peterrehm changed the base branch from 2.7 to 2.8 December 14, 2016 08:52
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Dec 16, 2016

👍 LGTM

Status: Reviewed

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Dec 25, 2016

Thank you @peterrehm.

xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2016
This PR was submitted for the 2.8 branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes #7249).

Discussion
----------

[Validator] Fixed wrong inheritance information

There is wrong information about the inheritance of validation groups.

I have tested it extensively and some findings are documented here: symfony/symfony#20857

I also asked Bernhard about what the intended behavior is, but I assume
as I have documented it now was the original expected behaviour.

Commits
-------

49dfdf4 Fixed wrong inheritance information
@xabbuh xabbuh closed this Dec 25, 2016
@peterrehm peterrehm deleted the patch-1 branch January 10, 2017 17:53
xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2017
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.

Discussion
----------

[Validation] Revert #7249

This reverts commit 6c3ff5e since
due to symfony/symfony#21183 the logic is meanwhile changed.

Commits
-------

3250ed4 Revert "Fixed wrong inheritance information"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants