Skip to content

Conversation

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

@xabbuh xabbuh commented Nov 14, 2024

Q A
Branch? 7.1
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Deprecations? no
Issues
License MIT

Having a getType() method on an extractor is not enough. Such a method may exist to be forward-compatible with the TypeInfo component. We still must not call it if the TypeInfo component is not installed to prevent running into errors for not-defined classes when the TypeInfo component is not installed.

Having a getType() method on an extractor is not enough. Such a method may
exist to be forward-compatible with the TypeInfo component. We still must
not call it if the TypeInfo component is not installed to prevent running into
errors for not-defined classes when the TypeInfo component is not installed.
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member Author

xabbuh commented Nov 14, 2024

our CI didn't catch this because the TypeInfo component is always installed as a dev dependency

@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Thank you @xabbuh.

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas merged commit e26e1f8 into symfony:7.1 Nov 14, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the pr-53160 branch November 14, 2024 22:32
This was referenced Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants