Skip to content

Conversation

@bobvandevijver
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Branch? 4.4
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Deprecations? no
Tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

When scanning for more possible error like fixed in #42316, I found this one. I decided to create a separate MR as I'm not sure falling back to / would be the desired behaviour for a missing REQUEST_URI, or that maybe an exception would be more suitable.

@derrabus
Copy link
Member

I don't think that this change is necessary. This class is meant to be used when serving a request inside an Apache HTTPd. And in that context, REQUEST_URI should always be set.

@bobvandevijver
Copy link
Contributor Author

bobvandevijver commented Jul 29, 2021

Should is not must, but I agree that this will be an uncommon if not ever happening case. Anyways, feel free to close it, that's also why I made this a separate PR!

@derrabus
Copy link
Member

Let's close then. I'd rather not change that class unless someone really encounters an issue with this.

@derrabus derrabus closed this Jul 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants