Skip to content

Conversation

@ro0NL
Copy link
Contributor

@ro0NL ro0NL commented Aug 14, 2019

Q A
Branch? 3.4
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #...
License MIT
Doc PR symfony/symfony-docs#...

This avoids a little conflict with #33140

data is not impacted (today), but i like to make our data selection as explicit as possible and avoid ever pulling in deprecated or e.g. legacy languages.

@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Thank you @ro0NL.

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas merged commit fbd4ce4 into symfony:3.4 Aug 14, 2019
nicolas-grekas added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2019
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.

Discussion
----------

[Intl] Explicit check

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 3.4
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no     <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes    <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #...   <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!-- required for new features -->

This avoids a little conflict with #33140

data is not impacted (today), but i like to make our data selection as explicit as possible and avoid ever pulling in `deprecated` or e.g. `legacy` languages.

Commits
-------

fbd4ce4 [Intl] Explicit check
@ro0NL ro0NL deleted the intl-check branch August 14, 2019 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants