Fix feature detection for IE #19038
Closed
Fix feature detection for IE #19038
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
operator `!` has higher precedence (4) than operator `in` (8). Parentheses are mandatory here.
Member
|
👍 Status: reviewed |
Member
|
Good catch, thanks @alsciende. |
stof
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2016
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes #19038). Discussion ---------- Fix feature detection for IE | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | 2.7 | Bug fix? | yes | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | | License | MIT | Doc PR | operator `!` has higher precedence (4) than operator `in` (8). Parentheses are mandatory here to have a chance at passing the test. Commits ------- b35658b Fix feature detection for IE
Merged
This was referenced Jun 30, 2016
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
operator
!has higher precedence (4) than operatorin(8). Parentheses are mandatory here to have a chance at passing the test.