Skip to content

feat: add tools/c-impl-status to track all C dependecy implementation status of a package#11120

Draft
DhruvArvindSingh wants to merge 3 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
DhruvArvindSingh:feat/tools/c-impl-status
Draft

feat: add tools/c-impl-status to track all C dependecy implementation status of a package#11120
DhruvArvindSingh wants to merge 3 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
DhruvArvindSingh:feat/tools/c-impl-status

Conversation

@DhruvArvindSingh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DhruvArvindSingh DhruvArvindSingh commented Mar 24, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Resolves None.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • This tool sees all the dependency of a package and sees weather its C implementation is present or not.

  • If the dependency is of tool folder or any other util package then ignores weather the C implementation exist.

  • If the package is not from any tools/utils folder then it shows that the package requires its C implementation first.

  • Example 1:
    Input:

node lib/node_modules/@stdlib/_tools/pkgs/c-impl-status/bin/cli @stdlib/math/base/special/betainc

Output:

Package: @stdlib/math/base/special/betainc
Package C status: ✗ Needs src/ directory + C implementation

Dependencies summary:
  Total: 1
  Has C: 0
  Needs C: 1
  JS-only (tools/constants): 0
  External: 0

⚠️  NOT READY - 1 blocking package(s) need C implementation.

Dependencies:
  ✗ @stdlib/math/base/special/kernel-betainc (needs src/ + C)

Blocking packages (implement C for these first):
  ✗ @stdlib/math/base/special/kernel-betainc (needs src/ + C)

Legend:
  ✓  Has C implementation
  ✗  Needs C implementation (missing src/ or C files)
  -  JS-only by design (tools/constants)
  ?  External package (not in stdlib)
  • Example 2:
    Input:
node lib/node_modules/@stdlib/_tools/pkgs/c-impl-status/bin/cli @stdlib/math/base/special/polygamma

Output:

Package: @stdlib/math/base/special/polygamma
Package C status: ✗ Needs src/ directory + C implementation

Dependencies summary:
  Total: 29
  Has C: 18
  Needs C: 0
  JS-only (tools/constants): 10
  External: 1

✅ READY for C implementation - all dependencies have C. Add src/ directory first.

Dependencies:
  - @stdlib/array/base/zeros (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/eps (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/ln-pi (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/ln-two (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/max (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/max-ln (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/ninf (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/pi (JS-only (tools/constants))
  - @stdlib/constants/float64/pinf (JS-only (tools/constants))
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/assert/is-nonnegative-integer (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/abs (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/bernoulli (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/cospi (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/digamma (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/exp (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/factorial (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/floor (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/gammaln (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/ldexp (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/ln (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/min (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/pow (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/riemann-zeta (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/signum (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/sinpi (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/trigamma (2 C files)
  ✓ @stdlib/math/base/special/trunc (2 C files)
  - @stdlib/math/base/tools/evalpoly (JS-only (tools/constants))
  ? debug (external package)

Legend:
  ✓  Has C implementation
  ✗  Needs C implementation (missing src/ or C files)
  -  JS-only by design (tools/constants)
  ?  External package (not in stdlib)

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

  • None

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@DhruvArvindSingh
feat: add tools/c-impl-status
3611afb 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@DhruvArvindSingh
fix: upgraded copyright years
c167e82 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Tools Issue or pull request related to project tooling. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Mar 24, 2026
@DhruvArvindSingh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DhruvArvindSingh commented Mar 24, 2026

@Planeshifter @kgryte ,The idea is that , we can create a different tool on top of this which can create a hierarchy tree representation of a package family so that we can identify and implement bottleneck packages first.

@DhruvArvindSingh DhruvArvindSingh changed the title feat adds tools/c-impl-status to track all C dependecy implementation status of a package feat: add tools/c-impl-status to track all C dependecy implementation status of a package Mar 24, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2026
Open
@DhruvArvindSingh
fix: treats napi folder as pure js
92bd24c 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@DhruvArvindSingh DhruvArvindSingh mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2026
Closed
@DhruvArvindSingh DhruvArvindSingh marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2026 17:03
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Mar 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Tools Issue or pull request related to project tooling.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@DhruvArvindSingh @stdlib-bot