Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

• The constraint 'TokenStoreType extends string' is too restrictive. It should likely be 'TokenStoreType extends string | object' to match the condition check in line 113 where TokenStoreType is checked against {}
• Return type mismatch - the interface declares useUsers() returning ServerUser[] but the Team interface that this extends declares useUsers() returning TeamUser[]
• There is a syntax error in the super constructor call due to the ellipsis operator used incorrectly. Objects aren't being merged correctly. This syntax usage can lead to runtime errors when trying to pass the merged object to 'super()'. Verify that the intended alterations to the object occur before or outside of the super() call if needed.
• Throwing an error when no active span is found is too aggressive. The log function should gracefully fallback to console.log or another logging mechanism when there's no active span, since not all execution contexts will have an active span. This makes the code less resilient and could break functionality in non-traced environments.

📚 Relevant Docs

• Function sets backendContext with a new configuration but doesn't pass 'defaultProjectKeys'. Since defaultProjectKeys is required in the type definition and cannot be updated (throws error if tried to set), this will cause a type error.
• The schema is using array syntax for pick() which is incorrect for Yup schemas. The pick() method in Yup expects individual arguments, not an array. Should be changed to: emailConfigSchema.pick('type', 'host', 'port', 'username', 'sender_name', 'sender_email')

📚 Relevant Docs

• Creating a refresh token with current timestamp as expiration means it expires immediately. Should set a future date for token expiration.
• The 'tools' object is initialized as an empty object, even though 'tools' is presumably expected to contain tool definitions. This could cause the server capabilities to lack necessary tool configurations, thus potentially impacting functionalities that depend on certain tool setups.

📚 Relevant Docs

• 'STACK_SECRET_SERVER_KEY' is potentially being included in every request header without checking its existence again here. Although it's checked during initialization, this could lead to security issues as it's exposed in all communications where the header is logged or captured.

📚 Relevant Docs

• When adding 'use client' directive at the beginning, it doesn't check if file.text already contains the 'use client' directive. This could lead to duplicate 'use client' directives if the file already has one.

📚 Relevant Docs