Repository navigation
Conversation
Member
|
Grateful for your report and pull request. Though, I had to rewrite regexes :) (to feed my OCD midget) |
Author
|
That's okay, glad to know it's fixed :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original regex in greatest.py didn't work in a blind injection case that filters '>'. Payload sample from sqlmap: admin' AND ORD(MID((SELECT DISTINCT(IFNULL(CAST(schema_name AS CHAR),0x20)) FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA LIMIT 0,1),1,1))>64 AND 'XJnE'='XJnE
Also in the formula "tamper('1 AND A > B')", B in most cases is just a number, so rewrite the request using LEAST like LEAST(A,B+1)=B+1 makes it much shorter and easier to read than GREATEST(A,B+1)=A, hence the new least.py