simstudioai · waleedlatif1 · Sep 11, 2026 · Sep 11, 2026 · Sep 11, 2026
diff --git a/apps/sim/app/_shell/consent/consent-banner.test.tsx b/apps/sim/app/_shell/consent/consent-banner.test.tsx
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/**
+ * @vitest-environment jsdom
+ */
+import { act } from 'react'
+import { createRoot, type Root } from 'react-dom/client'
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
+
+const { mockUseConsentManager, mockUseHeadlessConsentUI } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
+  mockUseConsentManager: vi.fn(),
+  mockUseHeadlessConsentUI: vi.fn(),
+}))
+
+vi.mock('@c15t/nextjs/headless', () => ({
+  useConsentManager: mockUseConsentManager,
+  useHeadlessConsentUI: mockUseHeadlessConsentUI,
+}))
+
+vi.mock('@/app/_shell/consent/consent-preferences', () => ({
+  CONSENT_LINK_CLASS: 'link',
+  ConsentPreferences: () => <span data-testid='preferences' />,
+}))
+
+import { ConsentBanner } from '@/app/_shell/consent/consent-banner'
+
+let root: Root | null = null
+
+function render(): HTMLDivElement {
+  ;(globalThis as { IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT?: boolean }).IS_REACT_ACT_ENVIRONMENT = true
+  const container = document.createElement('div')
+  document.body.appendChild(container)
+  root = createRoot(container)
+  act(() => root?.render(<ConsentBanner />))
+  return container
+}
+
+function isBannerShown(container: HTMLDivElement): boolean {
+  return container.querySelector('section[aria-label="Cookie preferences"]') !== null
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  mockUseHeadlessConsentUI.mockReturnValue({
+    banner: { isVisible: true, allowedActions: ['accept', 'reject', 'customize'] },
+    dialog: { isVisible: false, allowedActions: [] },
+    openDialog: vi.fn(),
+    performAction: vi.fn(),
+    saveCustomPreferences: vi.fn(),
+  })
+})
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  act(() => root?.unmount())
+  root = null
+  vi.clearAllMocks()
+})
+
+describe('ConsentBanner', () => {
+  it.each(['backend', 'backend-cache-hit', 'ssr'])(
+    'asks for consent when the policy came from %s',
+    (initDataSource) => {
+      mockUseConsentManager.mockReturnValue({ initDataSource })
+
+      expect(isBannerShown(render())).toBe(true)
+    }
+  )
+
+  it('still renders a dialog the visitor opened, so the published control works', () => {
+    mockUseHeadlessConsentUI.mockReturnValue({
+      banner: { isVisible: false, allowedActions: [] },
+      dialog: { isVisible: true, allowedActions: ['accept', 'reject', 'customize'] },
+      openDialog: vi.fn(),
+      performAction: vi.fn(),
+      saveCustomPreferences: vi.fn(),
+    })
+    mockUseConsentManager.mockReturnValue({ initDataSource: 'offline-fallback' })
+
+    expect(isBannerShown(render())).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('asks nothing when the policy lookup fell back', () => {
+    // A bot challenge on the third-party `/init` makes the runtime substitute a
+    // generic opt-in policy, which would otherwise re-prompt visitors who had
+    // already consented under the real one.
+    mockUseConsentManager.mockReturnValue({ initDataSource: 'offline-fallback' })
+
+    expect(isBannerShown(render())).toBe(false)
+  })
+})
diff --git a/apps/sim/app/_shell/consent/consent-banner.tsx b/apps/sim/app/_shell/consent/consent-banner.tsx
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 'use client'
 
-import { useHeadlessConsentUI } from '@c15t/nextjs/headless'
+import { useConsentManager, useHeadlessConsentUI } from '@c15t/nextjs/headless'
 import { Chip } from '@sim/emcn'
 import { AnimatePresence, motion, useReducedMotion } from 'framer-motion'
 import Link from 'next/link'
@@ -29,20 +29,37 @@ const CATEGORIES_OPEN = { height: 'auto', opacity: 1 } as const
  * the light layer on `<html>` through `ThemeProvider`'s forced theme, or is a
  * themed app page where inheriting is what should happen — the card no longer
  * decides for itself.
+ *
+ * Nothing is asked *unprompted* when the policy lookup failed. `/init` answers
+ * from a third-party origin, and when that origin refuses the request — a bot
+ * challenge returns `403` with an HTML body — the runtime substitutes a generic
+ * opt-in policy rather than surfacing the failure. Volunteering a banner from
+ * it asks a question the visitor's jurisdiction may not require, and asks it of
+ * people who already answered, because the substituted policy's fingerprint
+ * never matches the one their stored consent was recorded under. The next load
+ * that reaches the real policy asks properly if it still needs to.
+ *
+ * A dialog the visitor opened themselves still renders, fallback or not: the
+ * Cookie Policy promises the choice can be changed at any time, and a control
+ * that silently does nothing breaks that promise. A choice saved during a
+ * fallback is recorded against the substituted policy and will be asked for
+ * again once the real one resolves, which is the lesser of the two failures.
  */
 export function ConsentBanner() {
   const { banner, dialog, openDialog, performAction, saveCustomPreferences } =
     useHeadlessConsentUI()
+  const { initDataSource } = useConsentManager()
   const prefersReducedMotion = useReducedMotion()
 
+  const isPolicyResolved = initDataSource !== 'offline-fallback'
   const isExpanded = dialog.isVisible
   const surfaceName = isExpanded ? 'dialog' : 'banner'
   const { allowedActions } = isExpanded ? dialog : banner
   const enterOffset = prefersReducedMotion ? 0 : 8
 
   return (
     <AnimatePresence>
-      {(banner.isVisible || dialog.isVisible) && (
+      {((isPolicyResolved && banner.isVisible) || dialog.isVisible) && (
         <motion.section
           aria-label='Cookie preferences'
           initial={{ opacity: 0, y: enterOffset }}

diff --git a/apps/sim/lib/consent/constants.ts b/apps/sim/lib/consent/constants.ts
@@ -14,6 +14,19 @@
  * Sim's consent instance. Public by construction — the browser calls it
  * directly, so it is a client-visible origin like the GTM and GA container IDs
  * in the root layout, not a credential.
+ *
+ * The browser must keep calling it directly. c15t documents a same-origin
+ * rewrite (`/api/c15t/:path*`) as an optimization, and it would also sidestep
+ * the bot challenge this origin sometimes answers with — but it resolves the
+ * jurisdiction from the address the request arrives from, and proxying makes
+ * every visitor arrive from our servers. Measured against the live instance:
+ * `x-forwarded-for`, `x-real-ip`, `true-client-ip`, `cf-connecting-ip` and
+ * `x-vercel-ip-country` are all ignored, and only c15t's own `x-c15t-country`
+ * override is honored. Sim has no edge that supplies a country header for us to
+ * forward into it, so behind a proxy every visitor would resolve to our region
+ * and no one in the EU would be asked for consent at all. The same dependency
+ * rules out the SSR prefetch, which reads those headers through
+ * `extractRelevantHeaders`. Revisit only alongside an edge that provides geo.
  */
 export const CONSENT_BACKEND_URL = 'https://sim-sim.inth.app'