docs: add missing docstrings to spec_evaluator.py (fix #442)#859
Open
lipikaparida-web wants to merge 1 commit intoscanapi:mainfrom
Open
docs: add missing docstrings to spec_evaluator.py (fix #442)#859lipikaparida-web wants to merge 1 commit intoscanapi:mainfrom
lipikaparida-web wants to merge 1 commit intoscanapi:mainfrom
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for supporting ScanAPI, and congratulations on your first contribution! A project committer will shortly review your contribution.
In the mean time, if you haven't had a chance please skim over the First Pull Request Guide which all pull requests must adhere to.
We hope to see you around!
Author
|
Hi maintainers 👋 I’ve opened a PR to add the missing docstrings to PR: #859 Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Added missing docstrings to
scanapi/evaluators/spec_evaluator.py.Motivation behind this PR?
This improves code readability and documentation quality by adding docstrings to public methods and helper functions, as requested in issue #442.
What type of change is this?
Documentation change (docstrings only). No functional changes.
Checklist
Issue
Fixes #442