Make parse-backticks more reliable#3397
Conversation
selector-observer in parse-backticksselector-observer to run parse-backticks
|
We have to test the selectors and narrow scope down since they are now global |
|
|
Yeah it's parsed Isn't the selector for that place is already included before this PR? https://github.com/sindresorhus/refined-github/pull/3397/files#diff-7b0a2c8650978a85cebddd08a46e40baL29 |
|
Funny it was not working for me before |
fregante
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems to work correctly so far. I'll be testing this more
|
Should we make a line break in between each unique page type? (Ex: |
|
I don't think there's any way to make it any more readable. It's a list of wildly different selectors, it's just what it is |
selector-observer to run parse-backticksparse-backticks more reliable
parse-backticks more reliableparse-backticks more reliable / test
parse-backticks more reliable / testparse-backticks more reliable
|
Looks great! Possible additions:
|
|
This is awesome!! https://github.com/tanmayrajani/notifications-preview-github is now parsed too!! |
|
Is it https://github.com/sindresorhus/refined-github/pull/3397/files#diff-7b0a2c8650978a85cebddd08a46e40baR31? I don't have the extension |
|
Yes. You should get it, its an awesome extension. |


On request by #3290 (comment)
Part of #3084
Edited the title and it stil runs well!!! 😋 (though there's about 2 seconds' delay)(Never mind, that isformat-conversation-titles)