Fix misleading Javadoc for Aggregation.nth(int)#22486
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis PR updates the Javadoc for Changesnth Aggregation Documentation Update
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Comment |
6bf749c to
262ae67
Compare
|
/ok to test 262ae67 |
|
@davidwendt thanks for taking a look at this PR! CI fails with: This seems unrelated to the PR. Should I fix it in this PR? |
@piotrrzysko Yes. If you modify a file you are expected to update the copyright year at the top of that file. |
@piotrrzysko Please execute |
The comment stated "non-null element" but the method defaults to NullPolicy.INCLUDE, meaning NULL values can be returned.
262ae67 to
9c2ccdc
Compare
|
/ok to test 9c2ccdc |
|
Builds are failing. We just need to wait until they are working again. |
Description
The comment stated "non-null element" but the method defaults to
NullPolicy.INCLUDE, meaning NULL values can be returned.Checklist