Skip to content

Conversation

@fegin
Copy link
Contributor

@fegin fegin commented Jan 30, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it _is_named_optimizer work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: D42858589

…empty

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 30, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/93303

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 Failures

As of commit 7d37ddc:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on master:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: distributed (fsdp) release notes category label Jan 30, 2023
…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Contributor

@fduwjj fduwjj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

…e state is empty"

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
fegin added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2023
…empty

Pull Request resolved: #93303

Optimizer state is not eager initializaion -- only NamedOptimizer and KeyedOptimizer are. This PR makes it `_is_named_optimizer` work with regular optimizers.
ghstack-source-id: 178827735

Differential Revision: [D42858589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D42858589/)
@fegin
Copy link
Contributor Author

fegin commented Jan 31, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "The failing test is not related"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/fegin/66/head branch June 8, 2023 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants