Skip to content

Conversation

@jinsu35
Copy link
Contributor

@jinsu35 jinsu35 commented Jan 13, 2023

Fixes #86806

@jinsu35 jinsu35 requested a review from kulinseth as a code owner January 13, 2023 07:03
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 13, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/92139

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit b68244f:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added ciflow/mps Run MPS tests (subset of trunk) release notes: mps Release notes category labels Jan 13, 2023
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 13, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@janeyx99 janeyx99 added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Jan 13, 2023
@gpomeranz
Copy link

Any chance to merge this branch? I've tested the changes and was able to complete a build with these changes.

@rinat-akhmetov
Copy link

@kulinseth, is there a way to progress the Pull Request?
All of the checks have been completed successfully apart from one, and I have attached a screenshot of the error message for your convenience.
Could you please provide any additional details about the PR that may be required beyond restarting the pipeline?
image

@25benjaminli
Copy link

Hi, will this be merged soon?

@DenisVieriu97
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot rebase

Copy link
Collaborator

@DenisVieriu97 DenisVieriu97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @jinsu35 - change looks good. Could you please merge it in?

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a rebase job. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully rebased fix-issue-86806 onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via git checkout fix-issue-86806 && git pull --rebase)

@kulinseth
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge -f "MPS tests are green"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/mps Run MPS tests (subset of trunk) Merged open source release notes: mps Release notes category triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[MPS] Add support for aten::remainder.Tensor_out for MPS backend

9 participants