Skip to content

Conversation

@lezcano
Copy link
Collaborator

@lezcano lezcano commented Dec 28, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

allclose it's data-dependent (returns a bool) so it does not play well
with functorch. We are skipping that check in the context of subclasses
to avoid hard errors.

Partially fixes #90499

cc @zou3519 @Chillee @samdow @soumith

`allclose` it's data-dependent (returns a bool) so it does not play well
with functorch. We are skipping that check in the context of subclasses
to avoid hard errors.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 28, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/91444

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 Failures

As of commit cbb629d:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@lezcano lezcano added module: functorch Pertaining to torch.func or pytorch/functorch release notes: torch.func release notes category for torch.vmap or torch.func.* APIs labels Dec 28, 2022
… subclasses"


`allclose` it's data-dependent (returns a bool) so it does not play well
with functorch. We are skipping that check in the context of subclasses
to avoid hard errors.

Partially fixes #90499

cc zou3519 Chillee samdow soumith

[ghstack-poisoned]
lezcano added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2022
`allclose` it's data-dependent (returns a bool) so it does not play well
with functorch. We are skipping that check in the context of subclasses
to avoid hard errors.

ghstack-source-id: cc6278a
Pull Request resolved: #91444
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure

@lezcano
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lezcano commented Dec 28, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated error"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/Lezcano/168/head branch June 8, 2023 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: functorch Pertaining to torch.func or pytorch/functorch open source release notes: torch.func release notes category for torch.vmap or torch.func.* APIs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants