*_scatter ops should preserve input stride/storage_offset #91029
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/91029
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 5d9ec88: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This was referenced Dec 16, 2022
github-actions
bot
requested review from
Chillee,
SherlockNoMad,
albanD,
antoniojkim,
ezyang,
jbschlosser,
miladm,
voznesenskym and
wconstab
[ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
Author
|
Done. I also had to update a ton of expect tests: eagerly applying a mutation back to the base during functionalization was also needed to get that test passing, and causes our graphs to wobble. |
Contributor
Author
|
This is also (unfortunately) technically BC-breaking, although hopefully: |
bdhirsh
added
release notes: python_frontend
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. [ghstack-poisoned]
bdhirsh
added
ciflow/trunk
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. [ghstack-poisoned]
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. cc mlazos soumith voznesenskym yanboliang penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen chunyuan-w XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire [ghstack-poisoned]
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. cc mlazos soumith voznesenskym yanboliang penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen chunyuan-w XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire [ghstack-poisoned]
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. cc mlazos soumith voznesenskym yanboliang penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen chunyuan-w XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire [ghstack-poisoned]
It turns out that we *do* need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to `test/test_functionalization.py`, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function. cc mlazos soumith voznesenskym yanboliang penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen chunyuan-w XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire [ghstack-poisoned]
bdhirsh
commented
Dec 22, 2022
| // the strides/storage_offset of its input. | ||
| // With the for loop fallback, each input tensor is a slice into | ||
| // the larger batched tensor. | ||
| m.impl("as_strided_scatter", torch::CppFunction::makeFromBoxedFunction<&vmapErrorFallback>()); |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc @zou3519, I ended up adding an error fallback for vmap as_strided_scatter, and xfail'ing some more tests
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It turns out that we do need to update *_scatter ops to return the exact same strides as their inputs. I added a test to
test/test_functionalization.py, which now trips thanks to Ed's functionalization stride debugging check. It only actually ends up tripping silent correctness if you try to .backward() on that function.Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
cc @mlazos @soumith @voznesenskym @yanboliang @penguinwu @anijain2305 @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @chunyuan-w @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @desertfire