-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[ao] making _is_activation_post_process private with BC #90359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/90359
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 19971a9: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This was referenced Dec 7, 2022
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
jcaip
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2022
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)! [ghstack-poisoned]
HDCharles
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2022
Pull Request resolved: #90359 same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a single function note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name ghstack-source-id: 175562238 Differential Revision: [D41793604](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/) **NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D41793604/)!
Contributor
Author
|
desync between fbcode and github, recreated this at #90554 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
same function in observer and quantize, consolidated to a
single function
note: this is a recreation of D40709276 which caused severa breakages due to not maintaining BC for models with cached code with calls to the old function name
Differential Revision: D41793604
NOTE FOR REVIEWERS: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on Phabricator!