Skip to content

Conversation

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Nov 29, 2022

Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 29, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/89859

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit b7f36c2:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@zou3519 zou3519 added module: autograd Related to torch.autograd, and the autograd engine in general release notes: autograd release notes category and removed module: autograd Related to torch.autograd, and the autograd engine in general labels Nov 29, 2022
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 requested a review from samdow November 29, 2022 20:23
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 requested review from samdow and soulitzer December 1, 2022 19:48
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Contributor

@soulitzer soulitzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! But curious what Alban thinks about inputs being expanded.

Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

cc ezyang albanD gqchen pearu nikitaved soulitzer Lezcano Varal7

[ghstack-poisoned]
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 requested a review from soulitzer December 6, 2022 14:48
Py_INCREF(outputs);
PyTuple_SET_ITEM(result.get(), 0, (PyObject*)ctx);
PyTuple_SET_ITEM(
result.get(), 1, (PyObject*)unpacked_input.input_tuple.get());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: don't need cast unpacked_input.input_tuple.get() or outputs

Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 7, 2022
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in eb314f9.

kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
Adds a setup_context staticmethod to autograd.Function.
If it exists, then the user splits the ctx-specific logic from the
forward() and puts it in the setup_context staticmethod.

Docs will come later when we remove the feature flag.

Test Plan:
- some light tests
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#89859
Approved by: https://github.com/soulitzer
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zou3519/568/head branch June 8, 2023 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: autograd release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants