-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[ONNX] Use VerificationOptions to wrap option arguments
#89807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/89807
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 FailuresAs of commit 18a33a3: The following jobs have failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
_VerificationOptions to wrap detailsVerificationOptions to wrap option arguments
[ghstack-poisoned]
titaiwangms
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchbot merge -g |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks on your PR pass since you used the green (-g) flag (ETA: 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 2 additional jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk ,trunk / cuda11.6-py3.10-gcc7-sm86 / test (default, 1, 4, linux.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu) Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "flaky cuda failure" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
GraphInfo#89947VerificationOptionsto wrap option arguments #89807