[Profiler] Memory profiler part 3: Schema parsing and mutable arguments #86854
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86854
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ No Failures, 2 PendingAs of commit b79f376: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This was referenced Oct 13, 2022
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
added 2 commits
October 17, 2022 14:49
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
added 2 commits
October 21, 2022 11:42
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced Oct 23, 2022
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced Oct 25, 2022
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
added 5 commits
October 26, 2022 16:57
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
…ble arguments" The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) [ghstack-poisoned]
chaekit
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2022
robieta
added
the
ciflow/periodic
Contributor
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge -g |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks on your PR pass since you used the green (-g) flag (ETA: 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
kulinseth
pushed a commit
to kulinseth/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2022
…ts (pytorch#86854) The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc. We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision. Differential Revision: [D40220390](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40220390/) Pull Request resolved: pytorch#86854 Approved by: https://github.com/chaekit
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
The appropriate annotation for a block of memory is a function of time: an input can be mutated in-place to become an activation, a clever kernel might steal the memory of a detached input (such as a mask) to use as output memory, etc.
We could pessimistically assume that all ops mutate all of their inputs, however inspection of schema allows us to significantly narrow that assumption with minimal effort. Checking schemas also allows us to distinguish between dispatcher ops (which have load bearing semantics) and user annotations with reasonably high precision.
Differential Revision: D40220390