Skip to content

Conversation

@robieta
Copy link
Contributor

@robieta robieta commented Oct 12, 2022

I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 12, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86752

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 10b2548:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Contributor

@slgong-fb slgong-fb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great styling and safety check! I had already noticed these changes from the unpublished diff stack.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 17, 2022
I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@robieta robieta added the release notes: profiler release notes category label Oct 19, 2022
@robieta
Copy link
Contributor Author

robieta commented Oct 20, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f "last ci failure is unrelated (test ops)"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Approval needed from one of the following (Rule 'superuser'):
rsemenov, robieta, ansley, helunwencser, wz337, ...

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

I noticed a couple abbreviations in the new optimizer capture code that are worth expanding. I also made the RawTensorMetadata a bit safer.

Differential Revision: [D40210702](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D40210702/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@robieta
Copy link
Contributor Author

robieta commented Oct 20, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Approval needed from one of the following (Rule 'superuser'):
robieta, teng-li, frankseide, kwen2501, ajliu, ...

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@robieta
Copy link
Contributor Author

robieta commented Oct 20, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Approval needed from one of the following (Rule 'superuser'):
voznesenskym, qxy11, janghyuncho, zdevito, dhthompson, ...

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Copy link
Member

@aaronenyeshi aaronenyeshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@robieta
Copy link
Contributor Author

robieta commented Oct 20, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @robieta.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/robieta/130/head branch June 8, 2023 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: profiler release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants