-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
Add meta support for _adaptive_avg_pool2d_backward #86359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86359
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No Failures, 1 PendingAs of commit 7c34470: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
albanD
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change looks good. missing xfail update?
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchbot merge -g |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks on your PR pass since you used the green (-g) flag (ETA: 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 additional jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
|
@pytorchbot merge -g |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks on your PR pass since you used the green (-g) flag (ETA: 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 additional jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
albanD
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM
CI failures seems to be infra?
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated CI failures" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
|
Hey @anjali411. |
|
@pytorchbot revert -m "causing unexpected success for functorch on master but PR is green (landrace?) https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/3227306657/jobs/5282180524 https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/a56a8c0fc0251bb4cd24b366a290db2e4beea747" -c "weird" |
|
@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here. |
|
@anjali411 your PR has been successfully reverted. |
This reverts commit a56a8c0. Reverted #86359 on behalf of https://github.com/clee2000 due to causing unexpected success for functorch on master but PR is green (landrace?) https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/3227306657/jobs/5282180524 https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/a56a8c0fc0251bb4cd24b366a290db2e4beea747
This reverts commit 3edf79d. [ghstack-poisoned]
This reverts commit 3edf79d. Reland of #86359 Pull Request resolved: #87074 Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):