-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[ao] fixing public v private for quantization_mappings.py #86025
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__ Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86025
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 5a6197a: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
| "DEFAULT_REFERENCE_STATIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_STATIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_QAT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_DYNAMIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_FLOAT_TO_QUANTIZED_OPERATOR_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_MODULE_TO_ACT_POST_PROCESS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_STATIC_SPARSE_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", | ||
| "DEFAULT_DYNAMIC_SPARSE_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these probably should be implementation details since we have getter functions, maybe add a TODO to remove them from public apis?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, will talk about it Thursday
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__ Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
|
/easycla As part of the transition to the PyTorch Foundation, this project now requires contributions be covered under the new CLA. See #85559 for additional details. This comment will trigger a new check of this PR. If you are already covered, you will simply see a new "EasyCLA" check that passes. If you are not covered, a bot will leave a new comment with a link to sign. |
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__ Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchmergebot merge |
|
@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here. |
…86025) Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__ Pull Request resolved: #86025 Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168 Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/73777d8a2bed1c8878a1858ab8241f5acf0d022b Test plan from GitHub: python test/test_public_bindings.py Reviewed By: seemethere Differential Revision: D40166974 Pulled By: seemethere fbshipit-source-id: 1cb60fdff94fa2c47ba451dd00997acb3d036d7e
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__ Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: ghstack-source-id: 30c1416 Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#86025
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary: no significant changes, just added all
Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags: