Skip to content

Conversation

Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__

Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86025

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 5a6197a:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Comment on lines +32 to +39
"DEFAULT_REFERENCE_STATIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_STATIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_QAT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_DYNAMIC_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_FLOAT_TO_QUANTIZED_OPERATOR_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_MODULE_TO_ACT_POST_PROCESS",
"DEFAULT_STATIC_SPARSE_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
"DEFAULT_DYNAMIC_SPARSE_QUANT_MODULE_MAPPINGS",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these probably should be implementation details since we have getter functions, maybe add a TODO to remove them from public apis?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, will talk about it Thursday

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 1, 2022
@albanD albanD removed their request for review October 3, 2022 15:01
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__

Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/easycla

As part of the transition to the PyTorch Foundation, this project now requires contributions be covered under the new CLA. See #85559 for additional details.

This comment will trigger a new check of this PR. If you are already covered, you will simply see a new "EasyCLA" check that passes. If you are not covered, a bot will leave a new comment with a link to sign.

Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__

Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@HDCharles
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchmergebot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here.
The merge job was triggered without a flag. This means that your change will be merged once all checks on your PR have passed (ETA: 0-4 Hours). If this is not the intended behavior, feel free to use some of the other merge options in the wiki.
Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team with feedback or questions!

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
…86025)

Summary:
no significant changes, just added __all__

Pull Request resolved: #86025
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168

Test Plan:
contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/73777d8a2bed1c8878a1858ab8241f5acf0d022b

Test plan from GitHub:
python test/test_public_bindings.py

Reviewed By: seemethere

Differential Revision: D40166974

Pulled By: seemethere

fbshipit-source-id: 1cb60fdff94fa2c47ba451dd00997acb3d036d7e
Rick0317 pushed a commit to Rick0317/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2022
Summary: no significant changes, just added __all__

Test Plan: python test/test_public_bindings.py

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 30c1416
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#86025
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/HDCharles/106/head branch June 8, 2023 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request cla signed Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants