🔗 Helpful links

• 🧪  See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/84423
• ✖️ Python docs build was skipped
• ✖️ C++ docs build was skipped
• ❓Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit our office hours
• ↩️  [fb-only] Re-run with SSH instructions

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 36137b9 (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

---

• 2/2 failures introduced in this PR

---

🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patterns

The following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages

Lint / lintrunner (1/1)

Step: "Run lintrunner on all files" (full log | diagnosis details)

2022-09-01T23:26:01.6614738Z ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

2022-09-01T23:26:01.6595624Z �[0m    �[2m155  154�[0m |�[1m�[2m �[0m�[2m    const c10::intrusive_ptr<ProcessGroup>& process_group,
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6596374Z �[0m    �[2m155     �[0m |�[31m�[1m-�[0m�[31m    const �[0m�[31m�[40m�[4mstd::vector<std::vector<at::Tensor>>�[0m�[31m �[0m�[31m�[40m�[4m&output_tensors,�[0m�[31m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6597142Z �[0m    �[2m     155�[0m |�[32m�[1m+�[0m�[32m    const �[0m�[32m�[40m�[4mstd::vector<std::vector<at::Tensor>>&�[0m�[32m �[0m�[32m�[40m�[4moutput_tensors,�[0m�[32m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6597759Z �[0m    �[2m157  156�[0m |�[1m�[2m �[0m�[2m    const at::TensorList& input_tensors,
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6598249Z �[0m    �[2m158  157�[0m |�[1m�[2m �[0m�[2m    const AllgatherOptions& opts) {
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6598815Z �[0m    �[2m159  158�[0m |�[1m�[2m �[0m�[2m  static auto op = c10::Dispatcher::singleton()
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6599156Z �[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6599297Z 
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6599598Z �[1m�[36mYou can reproduce these results locally by using `lintrunner`.�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6600223Z �[1m�[36mSee https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/lintrunner for setup instructions.�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6614738Z ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6655432Z ##[group]Run # Use jq to massage the JSON lint output into GitHub Actions workflow commands.
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6655850Z �[36;1m# Use jq to massage the JSON lint output into GitHub Actions workflow commands.�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6656136Z �[36;1mjq --raw-output \�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6656536Z �[36;1m  '"::\(if .severity == "advice" or .severity == "disabled" then "warning" else .severity end) file=\(.path),line=\(.line),col=\(.char),title=\(.code) \(.name)::" + (.description | gsub("\\n"; "%0A"))' \�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6657030Z �[36;1m  lint.json�[0m
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6703096Z shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6703298Z env:
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6703546Z   pythonLocation: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.13/x64
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6703854Z   LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.8.13/x64/lib
2022-09-01T23:26:01.6704094Z ##[endgroup]

---

🕵️‍♀️ 1 failure not recognized by patterns:

The following CI failures may be due to changes from the PR

Job	Step
build	Unknown

---

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/84423

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR
• 📄 Preview C++ docs built from this PR
• ❓ Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit our office hours

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 02a23f9:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@H-Huang has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

/easycla

As part of the transition to the PyTorch Foundation, this project now requires contributions be covered under the new CLA. See #85559 for additional details.

This comment will trigger a new check of this PR. If you are already covered, you will simply see a new "EasyCLA" check that passes. If you are not covered, a bot will leave a new comment with a link to sign.

@H-Huang has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@H-Huang has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@pytorchbot merge -f "Ran ciflow/trunk and all tests pass, using force to skip meta internal-only check since the files are the same as internal"

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator

@pytorchbot merge -f "Ran ciflow/trunk and all tests pass, using force to skip meta internal-only check since the files are the same as internal"

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Hey @H-Huang.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.