Skip to content

Conversation

@janeyx99
Copy link
Contributor

@janeyx99 janeyx99 commented May 20, 2022

Followup action to our API Limit SEV: #77194

I added this to the upload-test-stats workflow because that one has repo secret access and is run regularly enough to be able to capture the API usage situation.

The next step in the future will be to log our usage to Rockset so we can see a trend + better preempt this.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented May 20, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (25 Pending)

As of commit a472dae8b0 (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@janeyx99 janeyx99 force-pushed the add-check-api-rate branch from a472dae to 05f9fd3 Compare May 20, 2022 19:48
@janeyx99 janeyx99 requested review from a team and suo May 20, 2022 19:48
@janeyx99
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @janeyx99.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2022
…77998)

Summary:
Followup action to our API Limit SEV: #77194

I added this to the upload-test-stats workflow because that one has repo secret access and is run regularly enough to be able to capture the API usage situation.

The next step in the future will be to log our usage to Rockset so we can see a trend + better preempt this.

Pull Request resolved: #77998
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet

Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/1b878b4eaa984b7b1929a7d077078481d1d87e94

Reviewed By: seemethere

Differential Revision: D36599566

Pulled By: seemethere

fbshipit-source-id: 36cfffc30ddb3248818c88bc9ccdfbcf553af7c6
swang392 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2022
Followup action to our API Limit SEV: #77194

I added this to the upload-test-stats workflow because that one has repo secret access and is run regularly enough to be able to capture the API usage situation.

The next step in the future will be to log our usage to Rockset so we can see a trend + better preempt this.
Pull Request resolved: #77998
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants