Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 commented Apr 5, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: D35403589

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Apr 5, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit b665a35 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

🕵️‍♀️ 1 failure not recognized by patterns:

The following CI failures may be due to changes from the PR
Job Step Action
GitHub Actions pull / linux-bionic-rocm5.0-py3.7 / test (default, 2, 2, linux.rocm.gpu) Set up job 🔁 rerun

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

jerryzh168 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2022
Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 9ee7e35
Pull Request resolved: #75241
@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 requested review from andrewor14 and vkuzo April 5, 2022 01:06
…ict"

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
…ict"

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
…ict"

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

…ict"

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D35403589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35403589)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 added the topic: not user facing topic category label Apr 6, 2022
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #75241

We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: bdhirsh

Differential Revision: D35403589

fbshipit-source-id: 663703b310944a6b7c5ade6d07a4d938a6ca082b
…ict"

Summary:
We have a previous PR that enabled operator.add in backend_config_dict, this
PR moved the rest binary ops to backend_config_dict.
There are some ops left, which are not needed (previously fp16 ops), we
will move them in the following PR

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
 python test/test_quantization.py TestFXNumericSuiteCoreAPIs

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D35403589](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35403589)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants