-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[quant][fx] Cleanup unused to_fp16 check code in lowering #74969
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary: We can remove the check for fp16 ops now since we confirmed that fp16 ops are not used Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 2a8b798 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 3 new failures recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
|
@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Summary: We can remove the check for fp16 ops now since we confirmed that fp16 ops are not used Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: [D35258695](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35258695) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #74969 We can remove the check for fp16 ops now since we confirmed that fp16 ops are not used Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps Imported from OSS Reviewed By: andrewor14 Differential Revision: D35258695 fbshipit-source-id: 2297696493feb62a4c959e7fbdd6123f59615ef1
|
Reverting as it broke plethora of tests, for example: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/5766517514?check_suite_focus=true Surprisingly, there are is jobs associated with the latest pull request workflow for the commit: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2066837788 |
|
This pull request has been reverted by 9070d363d7532927acd732fe8e02fd5dc340c089. To re-land this change, please open another pull request, assignthe same reviewers, fix the CI failures that caused the revert and make sure that the failing CI runs on the PR by applying the proper ciflow label (e.g., ciflow/trunk). |
|
This pull request has been reverted by 0b845bb. To re-land this change, please open another pull request, assignthe same reviewers, fix the CI failures that caused the revert and make sure that the failing CI runs on the PR by applying the proper ciflow label (e.g., ciflow/trunk). |
|
I see, it did not show up because there was some problem with the CI...maybe I should test manually first |
|
This pull request has been reverted by 0b845bb. To re-land this change, please open another pull request, assignthe same reviewers, fix the CI failures that caused the revert and make sure that the failing CI runs on the PR by applying the proper ciflow label (e.g., ciflow/trunk). |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary:
We can remove the check for fp16 ops now since we confirmed that fp16 ops are not
used
Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFxOps
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Differential Revision: D35258695