Skip to content

Conversation

@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor

@rohan-varma rohan-varma commented Mar 30, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: D35242306

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Mar 30, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 1bc5619 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue label Mar 30, 2022
rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2022
Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)

ghstack-source-id: 152557257
Pull Request resolved: #74946
Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
Pull Request resolved: #74946

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.
ghstack-source-id: 152653316

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)
Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2022
Pull Request resolved: #74946

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.
ghstack-source-id: 152933958

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)
Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2022
Pull Request resolved: #74946

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.
ghstack-source-id: 152978204

Differential Revision: [D35242306](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35242306/)
@osalpekar
Copy link
Member

Can we merge this with GHF when it's ready?

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #74946

Warn instead of hard failure when fail to clone state_dict, as this
param might not be managed by FSDP and thus we do not expect to clone it.
ghstack-source-id: 152978204

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: mrshenli

Differential Revision: D35242306

fbshipit-source-id: d9eb58a2993341040e4a9f36fa388f423bd2ddc5
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2022

Hey @rohan-varma.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/rohan-varma/529/head branch April 8, 2022 23:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla signed oncall: distributed Add this issue/PR to distributed oncall triage queue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants