Skip to content

Conversation

@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor

@rohan-varma rohan-varma commented Mar 28, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

FSDP has 74 type ignores and more being added, it may be better to
exclude from typechecking until we can type it properly.

Differential Revision: D35186441

FSDP has 74 type ignores and more being added, it may be better to
exclude from typechecking until we can type it properly.

Differential Revision: [D35186441](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D35186441/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Mar 28, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 55ce756 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@kumpera
Copy link
Contributor

kumpera commented Mar 28, 2022

Could we convert this into a set of bootcamp tasks?

@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kumpera Some of it may be bootcampable, although the main issue is that mypy has trouble supporting attributes such as p._full_param_padded that are set outside of the constructor.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #74833

FSDP has 74 type ignores and more being added, it may be better to
exclude from typechecking until we can type it properly.
ghstack-source-id: 152354450

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: zhaojuanmao

Differential Revision: D35186441

fbshipit-source-id: d06d90a06dcdbd38033adc70d0e9374333d4dc9a
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @rohan-varma.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/rohan-varma/528/head branch April 1, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants