Skip to content

Conversation

@wconstab
Copy link
Contributor

This should allow torch/XLA to access this API
cc @wonjoolee95

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Mar 25, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit afb8fb3 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@wconstab has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@JackCaoG
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2022
Summary:
This should allow torch/XLA to access this API
cc wonjoolee95

Pull Request resolved: #74784

Reviewed By: shunting314

Differential Revision: D35159977

Pulled By: wconstab

fbshipit-source-id: 1ad3ebb691acf6968314c1f37558d684d9bc1cdf
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @wconstab.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@wconstab wconstab added release notes: lazy release notes category topic: not user facing topic category labels Mar 28, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the wconstab/metadata_api branch February 15, 2024 01:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants