Skip to content

Conversation

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Sep 15, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang ezyang@fb.com

Differential Revision: D23731276

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Sep 15, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit b364e08 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 6 times.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

ghstack-source-id: faf62f8
Pull Request resolved: #44722
iter,
[=](scalar_t a) -> scalar_t { return a; });
[=](scalar_t a) -> scalar_t { return a; },
[=](Vec256<scalar_t> a) -> Vec256<scalar_t> { return a; });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wow didn't realize we were not vectorizing copy for complex. thanks for the PR!

@anjali411 anjali411 added the module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch label Sep 15, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #44722 into gh/ezyang/838/base will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           gh/ezyang/838/base   #44722   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               67.92%   67.92%           
===================================================
  Files                     384      384           
  Lines                   49727    49727           
===================================================
+ Hits                    33777    33779    +2     
+ Misses                  15950    15948    -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch/utils/_benchmark/utils/common.py 79.33% <0.00%> (+1.65%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89aed1a...b364e08. Read the comment docs.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang merged this pull request in ac0d13c.

xuzhao9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2020
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #44722

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: anjali411

Differential Revision: D23731276

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: 4902c4b79577ae3c70aca94828006b12914ab7f9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants