Skip to content

Conversation

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Sep 14, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:

  • pytest test/test_vmap.py -v

Differential Revision: D23685356

To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2020
To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

Differential Revision: [D23685356](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23685356)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Contributor

@anjali411 anjali411 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like test_vmap is not added in this list https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/test/run_test.py and that's why (despite the test failures), the CI was green for #43208

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor Author

zou3519 commented Sep 14, 2020

Looks like test_vmap is not added in this list https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/test/run_test.py and that's why (despite the test failures), the CI was green for #43208

Thanks for pointing that out. I've added it to run_test in #44656. Fingers crossed that there are no Windows or rocm issues...

To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

Differential Revision: [D23685356](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23685356)

[ghstack-poisoned]
zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2020
To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

ghstack-source-id: 532bf14
Pull Request resolved: #44649
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Sep 14, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit b3442a4 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 2/2 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/2 non-CircleCI failure(s)

1 job timed out:

  • pytorch_linux_xenial_py3_clang5_asan_test2

ci.pytorch.org: 1 failed


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 7 times.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (gh/zou3519/305/base@a382fe1). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##             gh/zou3519/305/base   #44649   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                       ?   68.08%           
======================================================
  Files                          ?      384           
  Lines                          ?    49763           
  Branches                       ?        0           
======================================================
  Hits                           ?    33880           
  Misses                         ?    15883           
  Partials                       ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a382fe1...b3442a4. Read the comment docs.

To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

Differential Revision: [D23685356](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23685356)

[ghstack-poisoned]
zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

ghstack-source-id: f6dcd35
Pull Request resolved: #44649
@anjali411 anjali411 added the module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch label Sep 15, 2020
To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

Differential Revision: [D23685356](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23685356)

[ghstack-poisoned]
zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

ghstack-source-id: 596cb16
Pull Request resolved: #44649
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 merged this pull request in 1cd5ba4.

xuzhao9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2020
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #44649

To unblock #43208, which adds "is_complex" checks to backward formulas
that are being tested for batched gradient support with vmap.

Test Plan: - `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v`

Reviewed By: anjali411

Differential Revision: D23685356

Pulled By: zou3519

fbshipit-source-id: 29e41a9296336f6d1008e3040cade4c643bf5ebf
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zou3519/305/head branch September 20, 2020 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants