-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[quant] Support clone for per channel affine quantized tensor #44573
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary: Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
…sor" Summary: fixes: #33309 Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: [ghstack-poisoned]
| self.q_per_channel_zero_points(), | ||
| self.q_per_channel_axis(), | ||
| self.options().memory_format(memory_format), | ||
| c10::nullopt); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VitalyFedyunin is the memory format use correct? https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/aten/src/ATen/native/native_functions.yaml#L1367
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it looks like correct.
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 902446f (more details on the Dr. CI page): ✅ None of the CI failures appear to be your fault 💚
❄️ 1 failure tentatively classified as flakybut reruns have not yet been triggered to confirm:
|
VitalyFedyunin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Memory format usage is correct
| self.q_per_channel_zero_points(), | ||
| self.q_per_channel_axis(), | ||
| self.options().memory_format(memory_format), | ||
| c10::nullopt); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it looks like correct.
…sor" Summary: fixes: #33309 Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: [D23663828](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23663828) [ghstack-poisoned]
…sor" Summary: fixes: #33309 Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: [D23663828](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23663828) [ghstack-poisoned]
…sor" Summary: fixes: #33309 Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: [D23663828](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23663828) [ghstack-poisoned]
…sor" Summary: fixes: #33309 Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags: Differential Revision: [D23663828](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23663828) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
This pull request has been merged in 3f5bb2b. |
Stack from ghstack:
Summary:
fixes: #33309
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
Differential Revision: D23663828