Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 commented Sep 10, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: D23631142

…convert_jit

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 requested a review from apaszke as a code owner September 10, 2020 18:44
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue label Sep 10, 2020
…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 8af1a94 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 20 times.

…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
jerryzh168 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
…convert_jit

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 0daa572
Pull Request resolved: #44490
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #44490 into gh/jerryzh168/429/base will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##           gh/jerryzh168/429/base   #44490   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                   67.85%   67.85%           
=======================================================
  Files                         384      384           
  Lines                       50020    50022    +2     
=======================================================
+ Hits                        33940    33942    +2     
  Misses                      16080    16080           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch/quantization/quantize_jit.py 95.65% <100.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92f8f75...8af1a94. Read the comment docs.

…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
jerryzh168 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2020
…convert_jit

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: eef503e
Pull Request resolved: #44490
Copy link

@z-a-f z-a-f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Comment on lines 76 to 78
Module Finalize(Module& module,
QuantType quant_type,
const std::vector<std::string>& preserved_attrs) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: are these subject to BC?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you mean does this affect BC? I don't think so, these is an internal function.

for user function convert_jit this is an optional argument, so it won't affect BC either.

…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…inalize to convert_jit"

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D23631142](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23631142)

[ghstack-poisoned]
jerryzh168 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2020
…convert_jit

Summary:

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: ce3624a
Pull Request resolved: #44490
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in f575df2.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jerryzh168/429/head branch September 26, 2020 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants