Skip to content

Conversation

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator

@zasdfgbnm zasdfgbnm commented Aug 29, 2020

fixes #43833

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator

ngimel commented Aug 29, 2020

cool! does it fix #43579 by any chance?

@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Aug 29, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit ad6abaf (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 6 times.

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ngimel Tried and no, this doesn't

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 30, 2020

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@ab3ea95). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #43844   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   69.31%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      378           
  Lines             ?    46745           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    32403           
  Misses            ?    14342           
  Partials          ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ab3ea95...ad6abaf. Read the comment docs.

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Tests are passing

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ngimel has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@anjali411 anjali411 added the module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch label Aug 31, 2020
@zasdfgbnm zasdfgbnm deleted the fix-complex-type-cast branch August 31, 2020 18:58
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ngimel merged this pull request in 4ef12be.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: complex Related to complex number support in PyTorch open source

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

torch.tensor does not support list of complex tensor

7 participants