Skip to content

Conversation

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 3d542ff (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

XLA failure

Job pytorch_xla_linux_bionic_py3_6_clang9_build is failing. Please create an issue with title prefixed by [PT_BREAK] in pytorch/xla and link to to this PR. If you have questions, please reach out to @ailzhang / @dlibenzi / @JackCaoG.


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 31 times.

@mruberry mruberry self-requested a review August 26, 2020 04:14
@mruberry mruberry added triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module module: docs Related to our documentation, both in docs/ and docblocks labels Aug 26, 2020
@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There are so many failures cause by #43669, I believe we should hold this PR until #43669 is resolved.

@zasdfgbnm zasdfgbnm marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2020 18:57
@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mruberry This should be ready

@mruberry
Copy link
Collaborator

Want to rebase this? Last update was in August.

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mruberry I rebased this 4 hours ago

@mruberry
Copy link
Collaborator

@mruberry I rebased this 4 hours ago

Oh, cool. It's not showing properly for some reason.

add_docstr(torch.randint_like,
"""
randint_like(input, low=0, high, dtype=None, layout=torch.strided, device=None, requires_grad=False, \
randint_like(input, low=0, high, \\*, dtype=None, layout=torch.strided, device=None, requires_grad=False, \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's up with the "\*" here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some docs use \\* and some use *, I don't think they are different. I compiled and looked at the generated page, and I can not see the difference either. Here I used \\* simply because there is a similar operator also uses \\*.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eventually we should fix that inconsistency to avoid further confusion. This PR looks great, though.

@mruberry mruberry self-requested a review September 30, 2020 00:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@mruberry mruberry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great better engineering fix.

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mruberry merged this pull request in c2c7099.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: docs Related to our documentation, both in docs/ and docblocks open source triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants