-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
Properly check that reduction strings are valid for l1_loss, smoothl1_loss, and mse_loss. #43527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…_loss, and mse_loss.
|
TODO: testing |
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 24b31ac (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 10 times. |
…l1_loss, smoothl1_loss, and mse_loss." Differential Revision: [D23306786](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23306786)
…l1_loss, smoothl1_loss, and mse_loss." Differential Revision: [D23306786](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23306786) [ghstack-poisoned]
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## gh/gchanan/302/base #43527 +/- ##
=======================================================
+ Coverage 69.33% 69.34% +0.01%
=======================================================
Files 378 378
Lines 46741 46744 +3
=======================================================
+ Hits 32406 32414 +8
+ Misses 14335 14330 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
albanD
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
F.ctc_loss() is not tested here, is that on purpose?
…s, smoothl1_loss, and mse_loss." Differential Revision: [D23306786](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23306786)
|
good point, I'll add |
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D23306786