[jit] fix segfault in attribute lookup on loaded ScriptModules #43284
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
[ghstack-poisoned]
suo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2020
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
ghstack-source-id: a27e4a4
Pull Request resolved: #43284
facebook-github-bot
added
the
oncall: jit
dzhulgakov
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2020
…ules"
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: [D23224337](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23224337)
[ghstack-poisoned]
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 653f684 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
ci.pytorch.org: 2 failed
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 15 times. |
…ules"
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: [D23224337](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23224337)
[ghstack-poisoned]
…ules"
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: [D23224337](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23224337)
[ghstack-poisoned]
…ules"
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: [D23224337](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23224337)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## gh/suo/344/base #43284 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage 69.27% 69.27%
================================================
Files 381 381
Lines 47265 47265
================================================
+ Hits 32743 32744 +1
+ Misses 14522 14521 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
…ules"
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute
2. Check the originating Python class, in order to fulfill requests for, e.g. static methods or ignored methods.
In the case where you do:
```
inner_module = torch.jit.load("inner.pt")
wrapped = Wrapper(inner_module) # wrap the loaded ScriptModule in an nn.Module
torch.jit.script(wrapped)
```
The IR emitter may check for attributes on `inner_module`. There is no
originating Python class for `inner_module`, since it was directly
compiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
1. Check the JIT type for the attribute (not there!)
2. Check the originating Python class (this is a nullptr! segfault!)
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: [D23224337](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23224337)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack:
The IR emitter looks for attributes on modules like:
In the case where you do:
The IR emitter may check for attributes on
inner_module. There is nooriginating Python class for
inner_module, since it was directlycompiled from the serialized format.
Due to a bug in the code, we don't guard for this case an a segfault
results if the wrapper asks for an undefined attribute. The lookup in
this case looks like:
This PR guards this case and properly just raises an attribute missing
compiler error instead of segfaulting.
Differential Revision: D23224337