Skip to content

Conversation

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD commented Jul 16, 2020

Take 3

See original PR for bc-breaking details: #39299

@albanD albanD requested a review from apaszke as a code owner July 16, 2020 23:06
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@albanD has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator Author

albanD commented Jul 21, 2020

cc @Baranowski it finally got in without breaking anything :)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@albanD merged this pull request in 48569cc.

@albanD albanD added the module: bc-breaking Related to a BC-breaking change label Oct 9, 2020
mrshenli added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2020
#41567 changed the behavior
of chunk and split, and renamed the previous version as unsafe_*.
As a result, comm.scatter outputs become views, which leads to
the regression reported in #46242

This commit revert to use the previous versions of split and chunk.

[ghstack-poisoned]
mrshenli added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2020
#41567 changed the behavior
of chunk and split, and renamed the previous version as unsafe_*.
As a result, comm.scatter outputs become views, which leads to
the regression reported in #46242

This commit revert to use the previous versions of split and chunk.

ghstack-source-id: 1676545
Pull Request resolved: #46361
@albanD albanD deleted the reland_split branch October 12, 2022 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Merged module: bc-breaking Related to a BC-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants