-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
fix division by low precision scalar #41446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
msbaines
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks much for fixing so quickly!
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit c06b354 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 22 times. |
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ngimel has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
| gpu_kernel_with_scalars(iter, []GPU_LAMBDA(bool a, bool b) -> bool { | ||
| return a && b; | ||
| }); | ||
| } else if (!isIntegralType(iter.common_dtype(), /*includeBool*/ false) && (iter.is_cpu_scalar(1) || |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment here would be nice
mruberry
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool!
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ngimel has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
Before, inverse for division by scalar is calculated in the precision of the non-scalar operands, which can lead to underflow:
This PR makes results of multiplication by inverse and division the same.