-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.3k
[CUDA] addmm for complex #40431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CUDA] addmm for complex #40431
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit ac2c9b0 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
Extra GitHub checks: 1 failed
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 15 times. |
[ghstack-poisoned]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks fine, but you're going to have to handle ROCm differently. I'd probably just suggest putting in stub specializations that raise an error, instead of ifdefing it all out. I'm wrong! Just skip the tests
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
Differential Revision: [D22285916](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D22285916) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@anjali411 merged this pull request in 9393ac0. |
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D22285916