Skip to content

[DTensor] Fix foreach_max#169667

Closed
wconstab wants to merge 4 commits intogh/wconstab/469/basefrom
gh/wconstab/469/head
Closed

[DTensor] Fix foreach_max#169667
wconstab wants to merge 4 commits intogh/wconstab/469/basefrom
gh/wconstab/469/head

Conversation

@wconstab
Copy link
Contributor

@wconstab wconstab commented Dec 5, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/169667

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 895dbbb with merge base 716edc3 (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

[ghstack-poisoned]
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

[ghstack-poisoned]
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

[ghstack-poisoned]
wconstab added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

ghstack-source-id: 1fa2e24
Pull Request resolved: #169667
Copy link
Member

@zpcore zpcore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@wconstab
Copy link
Contributor Author

wconstab commented Dec 6, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 6, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

umechand-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#169667
Approved by: https://github.com/zpcore
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#169668
JacobSzwejbka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along
Pull Request resolved: #169667
Approved by: https://github.com/zpcore
ghstack dependencies: #169668
tiendatngcs pushed a commit to tiendatngcs/pytorch-Dec25 that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Addresses an issue reported where foreach_max and foreach_abs do not
compose, which claimed foreach_max and foreach_abs work fine
individually.

Actually, just adds support for foreach_max, which appears to have been
missing all along

ghstack-source-id: 9054c9f
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#169667
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/wconstab/469/head branch January 6, 2026 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: distributed (dtensor) release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants