Skip to content

[inductor] Quiesce triton compile workers by default#169485

Closed
masnesral wants to merge 2 commits intogh/masnesral/1/basefrom
gh/masnesral/1/head
Closed

[inductor] Quiesce triton compile workers by default#169485
masnesral wants to merge 2 commits intogh/masnesral/1/basefrom
gh/masnesral/1/head

Conversation

@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor

@masnesral masnesral commented Dec 3, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 3, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/169485

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 4 Unrelated Failures

As of commit e285381 with merge base afdff7f (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
ghstack-source-id: b9ff926
Pull Request resolved: #169485
@masnesral masnesral added the topic: not user facing topic category label Dec 3, 2025
@masnesral masnesral marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 17:50
@masnesral masnesral added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Dec 4, 2025
@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor Author

masnesral commented Dec 4, 2025

@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor Author

AFAIK, we've known about this compile-time flakiness since at least April, e.g., #152566

@masnesral masnesral requested review from c00w and ezyang December 4, 2025 17:55
@masnesral
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI @ezyang since you were asking about this feature for internal use case. See my comments above about compile-time measurements. I kinda doubt this feature would regress compile-time, but seems like we don't really have a way to measure.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx ipiszy kadeng muchulee8 amjames chauhang aakhundov coconutruben jataylo

[ghstack-poisoned]
masnesral added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 9645142
Pull Request resolved: #169485
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Dec 7, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -i

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

umechand-amd pushed a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
JacobSzwejbka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
liangxs pushed a commit to liangxs/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/masnesral/1/head branch January 7, 2026 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants